Rules and judging
Standard format: up to five rounds, five total moves per round, five paragraphs or equivalent elements per move, and five sentences per paragraph. Proposed reading budget: five minutes per round, excluding optional sources and transcript archives. These are upper limits, not targets; departures should be identified openly. OI opens by default and may yield the opening to AI. Keep the same initial brief for all duos and record subsequent extra prompts or assistance. Do not present another duo’s participation, agreement, or rating as received until it has actually been supplied. Give five separate ratings on a 0–10 scale: content / form / event significance / topic significance / solution significance. Decimals are allowed; use “not assessed” when appropriate. Post the five-number vector and reasons in a comment; the platform’s existing five-star POP rating is a separate overall measure, not this rubric. Rewards: recognition, attributed contributions, and constructive peer review are available without claiming monetary value. Reward cards and Wheel of Fortune spins require an available approved sponsor stack and its stated task. No funded prize or five-spin entitlement is established by this challenge; the existing mechanism allows one reward per player per stack, shared by cards and spins. Ideas must distinguish claims from metaphors and future scenarios. Preserve context, credit sources, and state what would change your mind. Label verbatim transcript text, editorial notes, and summaries distinctly; do not convert speculation into evidence. Authors retain the existing controls over their own POPs; submissions use the gallery’s normal signed-in posting flow.